RETRACTED ARTICLE
Soil Heavy Metal Pollution Around Iron Tailing Areas at Different Using Status
Fengmin Song1, 2, Xingchang Zhang*, 3, 4, Yanmin Wang2, Chen Li2
Article Information
Identifiers and Pagination:
Year: 2015Volume: 9
First Page: 113
Last Page: 120
Publisher ID: TOCENGJ-9-113
DOI: 10.2174/1874123101509010113
Article History:
Received Date: 10/06/2015Revision Received Date: 29/07/2015
Acceptance Date: 15/08/2015
Electronic publication date: 9/10/2015
Collection year: 2015
open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Heavy metal pollution was a dynamic changing process for a long period and on large spatial scale. The heavy metal content in tailing soil varied with time changing. The distribution and cumulative characteristics of heavy metals in different time and surrounding soil caused by ore dressing and smelting activities were different. The aim of this study was to assess the geochemical characteristics and pollution status of heavy metals in soil around 2 iron tailing areas at different using status. Samples were collected around the 2 different iron tailing and sieved through nylon sieves. Metals were measured in digested solutions by a atomic emission spectrometer. The concentration of all heavy metals (Fe, Mn, V, Cu, Ni) in the soil around using M tailing area exceeded local soil background value; however, the content of all metals except Fe in soil around closed W tailing areas were lower than background value. BCR results showed that average exchangeable fraction of Mn in soil around W and M accounted for 11.87%, 11.78% of the total concentration, respectively; average exchangeable and reducible fractions of Ni accounted for 26.97% and 13.59%, respectively; average oxidizable fraction of Cu accounted for 18.6%, 31.63% in soil around W and M, respectively, which were higher than other metals; residual fraction of Fe, V accounted for more than 80% of the total concentration. The results indicate the soil was moderately contaminated by heavy metal around M and unpolluted around W. However, the risk assessment results performed that Mn showed moderate potential ecological risk and other metals showed low potential risk.
